![]() |
Sermons Talks and Articles |
Tree
of Life Etz Chayim – the ‘Tree of Life’ – is the Hebrew name of Northwood & Pinner Liberal Synagogue. |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Wouldn’t you know it! As a Rabbi of 8 years, one tends to think that repetition might be the order of the day for chosen weekly Torah readings. Yet, I find myself coming across something new each week that I am not sure if I have focused upon before. This week is certainly a case in point. The parashah that I read contains only two verses that deal with the main matter at hand, the covenant being cut between God and the Israelites in the land of Moab (9-10). The remainder, describe rituals that would reaffirm the covenant made in Moab and before it at Horev, better known to us as Mt Sinai. These reinforcements, clearly illustrate the existential necessity of the covenantal relationship to the Israelites at the various stages of their development: acknowledging their freedom and potential at Sinai / Horev, their Peoplehood (Deut 27:9) on the steppes of Moab and finally their settlement of the Land at Mt Eval and Gerizim. Of academic note are inconsistencies in the parashah that point to it being a composite of material from different traditional backgrounds and editorial revisions. The formulations of the rituals - the use of stones to record the covenant, the building of an altar and the subsequent offerings to be made upon it, the blessings and curses – are to be found in other Near Eastern and Greek treatises as well as other parts of the Tanakh relating to other characters. Notable amongst the latter is the use of stones to ‘witness’ Jacob’s peace treaty with Laban. Nowadays, peace treaties are not scribed onto the plaster coating of stones. They are to be found in statute books, museums and of course on the internet. At each stage of the development of the State of Israel, distinct to the People of Israel, there have been momentous occasions when, if it were in the ancient world stones would have been erected and inscribed. This morning, (following UN approval of its partition plan for Palestine on 29th November 1947) the Declaration of Independence on 14th May 1948 (Hakhrazat Haatzmaut) stands out. As we know, it was met with Israeli acceptance but rejection by Arab leaders inside and outside of Palestine for varying reasons. Ultimately, it led to the establishment of the State of Israel and following that day a marker, a stele of stone was placed in the hearts of Jews in the infant Israel and the majority of the diaspora. On 23rd September 2011, Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas will apply to the UN Security Council for full UN membership of a Palestinian State. What will be created is a virtual State, for the US will veto it at this stage and then the Palestinian Authority will get ‘observer status’ through an easy majority in the General Assembly. Should a stele be erected? Most of the arguments that one might put forward to say ‘no’ now are unfortunately so flimsy that they are an antidote to conspiracy theorists who think that Jews are so clever that they rule the world. It is unilateral. Settlement blocks and the withdrawal from Gaza were and continue to be unilateral. A deal must be determined by the two parties and not an outside entity. Remember what occasion established the State of Israel: not Hakhrazat Haatzmaut but a stele erected by the United Nations. The sad fact is that most Israelis have forgotten how to say ‘yes’ in foreign affairs, a position that in the first half of their existence ensured attacks from Arab nations unable to accept ‘gifts’ from the Zionist entity but also guaranteed support and assistance from the western world as Yasser Arafat was seen as the sole obstacle to peace. Amen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Member - © Copyright 2011 NPLS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||